Peer Review Process

All research articles submitted to Journal Smart Computing and Applications (JSCA) undergo a rigorous peer-review process to ensure technical accuracy, scientific significance, and clarity of presentation.

1. Initial Screening (Desk Review)

Upon submission, the Editor-in-Chief or Section Editor performs an initial screening. Manuscripts may be rejected at this stage if:

  • The topic is outside the Aims and Scope of JSCA.

  • The Similarity Index (Plagiarism check) exceeds 20%.

  • The manuscript does not follow the official JSCA Template.

  • The technical quality is insufficient for peer review.

2. Double-Blind Peer Review

Manuscripts that pass the initial screening are sent to at least two (2) independent reviewers who are experts in the relevant field. JSCA employs a double-blind review system, meaning:

  • The identity of the reviewers is hidden from the authors.

  • The identity of the authors is hidden from the reviewers.

3. Reviewer Recommendations

Reviewers evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodology, results, and contribution to the field of smart computing. They will provide one of the following recommendations:

  • Accept Submission: The paper is ready for publication as is.

  • Revisions Required: Minor changes are needed before acceptance.

  • Resubmit for Review: Major revisions are needed, and the paper must go through another round of review.

  • Decline Submission: The paper is not suitable for publication in JSCA.

4. Final Decision

The Editorial Board makes the final decision based on the reviewers' reports. If there is a conflict between reviewers, a third reviewer may be consulted. The final decision is communicated to the author, usually within 4–8 weeks from the date of submission.